================
Comment at: include/__atomic:85
@@ +84,3 @@
+{
+ *__dest = __val;
+}
----------------
Should these fall back on the __sync_* ones instead of just dropping the
atomicness? It seems a little precarious to silently default to non-atomic
implementations for these (unless this is for a single-threaded build of the
library).
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10406
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
