Hi, On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Yaron Keren <yaron.ke...@gmail.com> wrote: > ismail: > > I do not find the mingw.org distribution useful anymore compared with the > mingw-w64 based ones. > > OTOH supporting mingw,org seems trivial, few code lines in MinGW::MinGW and > in MinGW::AddClangCXXStdlibIncludeArgs to get the right directories and > commenting out the -lpthread you mentioned. > mingw.org is still quite popular, see the number of download for the > installers > > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/files/Installer/mingw-get/mingw-get-0.6.2-beta-20131004-1/ > > (ignore the other numbers, they are inflated since the installer download > them). > > I don't have a strong opinion. We can decide that clang does not support > mingw.org and or go on with the minimal code support required.
You are right, once this patch is in the rest can be decided later on. Thanks for working on this. ismail _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
