Looks good. Thanks! On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 11:16 PM Aaron Ballman <aa...@aaronballman.com> wrote:
> I was making a brief foray into AST matchers over exception handling > code today, and I noticed there's no way (that I could find) to match > only catch-all exception handlers. Eg) > > try { > } catch (int) { > } catch (...) { // Only want to match this > } > > The attached patch adds the matcher, test case, and documentation for > such a thing. I am not strongly tied to "catch all" as the name, but > alternatives like "handlesAnyType" sound like it would match > catch(int) as well as catch(...). If there's a better name, I'd be > happy to make use of it. > > Thanks! > > ~Aaron >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits