In http://reviews.llvm.org/D10997#200672, @EricWF wrote:

> I don't think we need any changes in `__functional_03` because we don't 
> provide bind in 03 :)


The changes in `__functional_03` apply to commented out code. I added those 
just for the sake of completeness, although I doubt there will ever be an '03 
`bind`. There'd be no harm in dropping them.


================
Comment at: include/functional:2188
@@ -2187,2 +2187,3 @@
         <
             is_convertible<typename __bind_return<_Fd, _Td, tuple<_Args&&...> 
>::type,
+                           result_type>::value || is_void<_Rp>::value,
----------------
EricWF wrote:
> We could probably save a bunch of SFINAE here by using `__lazy_or` and 
> putting the `is_void` check first. However I'm not sure that could hide 
> errors caused by not evaluating `__bind_return`. Thoughts?
IIUC, `__bind_return` is SFINAE-ing out on a resulting ill-formed INVOKE 
expression. Strictly speaking I don't think it is required, but since it's 
already there I'd rather be consistent.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D10997




_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to