rjmccall added a comment. Good catch!
The better fix would be to ignore the bitfield's abstract storage alignment and instead use the base l-value's alignment, adjusted with alignmentAtOffset to the offset of the bitfield's storage. This ensures we get the right alignment when the base l-value is *over*-aligned: in a packed struct, bitfield storage at offset 0 will have alignment 1, but if the packed struct itself is known to have alignment 4 (e.g., if it is embedded in an unpacked struct), then we still know that the storage has alignment 4.alignmentAtOffset(0) == 4. Also, please use CreateAlignedStore and CreateAlignedLoad. http://reviews.llvm.org/D11034 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
