On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Reid Kleckner <r...@google.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Nico Weber <tha...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Reid Kleckner <r...@kleckner.net> wrote: >> >>> Author: rnk >>> Date: Fri Jul 10 17:25:44 2015 >>> New Revision: 241952 >>> >>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=241952&view=rev >>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_viewvc_llvm-2Dproject-3Frev-3D241952-26view-3Drev&d=AwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=BSqEv9KvKMW_Ob8SyngJ70KdZISM_ASROnREeq0cCxk&m=43o64PHy3PY8fHJJNk57N4dKCjTig5KKi1cqeZpMalA&s=O0MLvnqUJxG7KxnI0pjrsDPb7T4jFApDMs_sXczWSxU&e=> >>> Log: >>> Disable C++ EH by default for clang-cl and MSVC environments >>> >>> We don't need any more bug reports from users telling us that MSVC-style >>> C++ exceptions are broken. Developers and adventurous users can still >>> test the existing functionality by passing along -fexceptions to either >>> clang or clang-cl. >>> >> >> Cool. Is it really worth it to make -fexceptions a core option though? >> One day, exceptions will work and then /EHsc does the right thing. Until >> then, regular users shouldn't use -fexceptions, and irregular users can use >> -Xclang -fexceptions (which makes this look unsupported, just like it is). >> > > Well, you really need to do '-Xclang -fcxx-exceptions -Xclang > -fexceptions', which is pretty heinous. > …which is ok since regular people shouldn't do this anyways, no?
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
