ahatanak added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D11462#210805, @echristo wrote:
> Do we accept the inverse option here? (If not, why not?) If so, this will > add it in places it isn't supposed to go. > > -eric This part was committed in r227062 for ffixed-x18. I don't think adding an inverse option fno-fixed-x18 was discussed when the original patch was reviewed: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20150119/121916.html ffixed-r9 doesn't have an inverse option either. http://reviews.llvm.org/D11462 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits