Prazek added inline comments. ================ Comment at: lib/CodeGen/CGVTables.cpp:190-191 @@ -189,4 +189,4 @@ // Fix up the returned value, if necessary. - for (llvm::Function::iterator I = Fn->begin(), E = Fn->end(); I != E; I++) { - llvm::Instruction *T = I->getTerminator(); + for (auto &BBlock : *Fn) { + llvm::Instruction *T = BBlock.getTerminator(); if (isa<llvm::ReturnInst>(T)) { ---------------- majnemer wrote: > We all take issue with some part of the coding style but it is important that > we all stick to it. Yep, I hope my middle aproach with "BBblock" is similiar enough. Seriously name like BB for newbie like me doesn't give me any information more than 2 random letters
http://reviews.llvm.org/D11446 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits