rnk added inline comments. ================ Comment at: lib/CodeGen/TargetInfo.cpp:1861-1866 @@ -1860,8 +1860,8 @@ Current = Integer; } else if ((k == BuiltinType::Float || k == BuiltinType::Double) || (k == BuiltinType::LongDouble && getTarget().getTriple().isOSNaCl())) { Current = SSE; } else if (k == BuiltinType::LongDouble) { Lo = X87; Hi = X87Up; ---------------- Any reason we can't do the same fp classification here like we do below for complex types?
================ Comment at: lib/CodeGen/TargetInfo.cpp:1975-1976 @@ -1974,4 +1975,1 @@ - else if (ET == getContext().DoubleTy || - (ET == getContext().LongDoubleTy && - getTarget().getTriple().isOSNaCl())) Lo = Hi = SSE; ---------------- Nice, I like this simplification. ================ Comment at: lib/CodeGen/TargetInfo.cpp:2528 @@ -2520,1 +2527,3 @@ classifyReturnType(QualType RetTy) const { + // TODO: Simplify classify to handle f128 according to AMD64 ABI. + if (const BuiltinType *BT = RetTy->getAs<BuiltinType>()) { ---------------- Why can't we classify IEEEQuad long doubles as SSE in the usual `classify()` implementation? ================ Comment at: lib/CodeGen/TargetInfo.cpp:2667 @@ -2652,1 +2666,3 @@ { + // TODO: Simplify classifyArgumentType to handle f128 according to AMD64 ABI. + if (const BuiltinType *BT = Ty->getAs<BuiltinType>()) { ---------------- ditto http://reviews.llvm.org/D11437 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits