EricWF added a comment. @eugenis: Sorry for the long delay and multiple pings.
I don't feel comfortable adopting ABI changes until libc++ has a concrete plan for adopting, managing and testing these changes. @mclow.lists proposed a method for managing these changes a while ago but it hasn't moved forward. (see http://clang-developers.42468.n3.nabble.com/Proposal-Managing-ABI-changes-in-libc-td4042799.html) What I want to avoid creating a disjoint set preprocessor macros that change the libc++ ABI. Until we have an idea about how to manage these changes I don't know what to do with this patch. I am very sorry and thanks for the patch. Hopefully we will figure something out soon. http://reviews.llvm.org/D10677 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
