Hi Zhanyong, 2009/10/15 Zhanyong Wan (λx.x x) <[email protected]>: > 2009/10/15 Anders Carlsson <[email protected]>: >> Hi Zhanyong! >> >> I did not see your patch and committed a similar fix. Sorry about that! (Fix >> looks great though :) > > No problem. Glad it's fixed now. > > I'm wondering how the clang community coordinates effort. How do we > prevent duplicated work? I assigned the bug to myself - is there > anything else I should do to indicate that I was working on it? > Thanks,
Currently, we don't really do much in the way of coordination. Our community is small enough that most of the active contributors "just know" what other people are working on, and a lot of us are on the #llvm IRC channel. We don't generally use the "assigned to" field in bugzilla, so people aren't used to checking it. If you are working on a particular bugzilla, its probably best to add a comment that says "I'm working on this". - Daniel >> >> Anders >> >> 15 okt 2009 kl. 17.01 skrev Zhanyong Wan (λx.x x): >> >>> Can someone review this? Thanks. >>> >>> C++ 5.[14,15]: the && and || operators produce a bool. >>> >>> C has no bool type and thus the rule is different there: >>> >>> C99 6.5.[13,14]: the && and || operators produce an int. >>> >>> Currently clang always thinks the result is an int (the C99 behavior). It >>> should consider the result type bool in C++ mode. >>> >>> -- >>> Zhanyong >>> <pr5206.patch>_______________________________________________ >>> cfe-commits mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >> >> > > > > -- > Zhanyong > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
