On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:58 AM, Sebastian Redl <[email protected]> wrote: > Author: cornedbee > Date: Thu Feb 16 04:58:10 2012 > New Revision: 150682 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=150682&view=rev > Log: > Make CXXNewExpr contain only a single initialier, and not hold the used > constructor itself. > > Holding the constructor directly makes no sense when list-initialized arrays > come into play. The constructor is now held in a CXXConstructExpr, if > construction is what is done. The new design can also distinguish properly > between list-initialization and direct-initialization, as well as implicit > default-initialization constructors and explicit value-initialization > constructors. Finally, doing it this way removes redundance from the AST > because CXXNewExpr doesn't try to handle both the allocation and the > initialization responsibilities.
Does this have any effect on http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=11757 ? -Eli _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
