On Apr 11, 2012, at 9:25 AM, David Chisnall <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 11 Apr 2012, at 17:22, David Blaikie wrote:
> 
>> Any possibility of a test case? (I haven't looked closely enough to
>> understand how this impacts conversion sequences in observable ways,
>> but I assume it does one way or another)
> 
> There's a test case for the bug it fixes.  I'd welcome test cases for any 
> bugs it introduces…

It still wasn't computing the sequences correctly. I've fixed it and added some 
tests in r154596. _Atomic still needs a bit of work, but it seems to be 
sufficient for libc++ now.

        - Doug
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to