On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Nikola Smiljanic <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Sebastian Redl > <[email protected]> wrote: > > The real question is what how much code depends on this. I'm not sure, > but I think we generally try not to support every oddity the MS compiler > allows, only those that are necessary to parse system headers (including > MS-supplied libraries like MFC and ATL) or else are very common. If they > just occasionally appear in client code, it would be better to fix that > code. > > I didn't really think about this :) but you're right, we probably > don't need this. Francois? > Is there a reason that the relevant code can't just be built in C++11 mode anyway? IIRC Microsoft's compiler doesn't explicitly distinguish between C++98 and C++11 modes.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
