On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:09:23PM -0000, Richard Smith wrote: > Author: rsmith > Date: Thu Apr 19 17:09:22 2012 > New Revision: 155161 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=155161&view=rev > Log: > In an attempt to reduce confusion, mark 'Strong compare exchange' as done, > since > we generate correct code for both strong and weak atomic compare-exchanges, > even > though we don't propagate to the IR enough information to generate optimal > weak > compare-exchanges on architectures which support them.
Can you at least add a foot note for this? E.g. "Recognized, but currently not exploited by the code generator" or something like that? Joerg _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
