On Apr 24, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Julien Lerouge wrote: > > Looks good to me. Thanks. > > The only thing I'd be worried about is that this could break current > users of those annotations who expect the casts (although it would be an > easy fix). That's the reason why I kept the casts when I backported this > thing from llvm-gcc.
Hi Julien, Thanks for reviewing. I agree with the compatibility concern. Hope people will like the patch since now it's way easier to extract the annotation (as well as a correct semantics compared to the odd truncation-extension). > I'll apply your patch (unless you have commit access?). No, I don't. Thanks a lot for the help. - xi _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
