On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Anders Waldenborg <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 08:29:05PM +0200, Manuel Klimek wrote: >> Call it underlying_type instead then? That would also document the >> intention... > > Thanks for review. > > underlying_type indeed is better. Updated patch attached. Also changed > "chld" in the test.
So that was originally patch number 5 right? :) I'm getting confused, but this one looks good to me! Cheers, /Manuel _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
