On Jul 10, 2012, at 9:26 PM, Rafael Espíndola wrote: >> Does this do the right thing for explicit specializations? > > Good question. I would probably expect the specialization to take the > visibility of push, and the attached patch implements it. > Unfortunately gcc disagrees and in the testcase included in the patch > it produces undefined references for the method in vector<int> and > vector<unsigned>. > > What do you think?
Could this code just reasonably be moved to ActOnTagFinishDefinition? John. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
