Ah, yes that makes things simpler. New patch attached. It would be great if someone could comment on the status of TLS on Darwin, NetBSD and Windows, though.
Thanks, Hans On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Rafael Espíndola <[email protected]> wrote: > The patch itself I think is good, but I don't think you need a driver > test. Can't you use %clang_cc1 -verify to test? > > On 1 August 2012 12:32, Hans Wennborg <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The attached patch changes the TargetInfo for OpenBSD to consider TLS >> unsupported. (PR13502) >> >> I'm not sure what the best way to test this is. I've added an attempt, >> but would love to get comments here. >> >> It also makes me wonder if we get this right for other targets. For >> instance, what's the status of TLS for NetBSD? Solaris? And I thought >> LLVM did support TLS on Windows? >> >> Please take a look. >> >> Thanks, >> Hans
openbsd_tls2.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
