Good to see you still around for a bit. Is this supposed to only match __strcpy_chk and not __builtin___strcpy_chk? Because then you need a CHECK-NOT. (And to ensure that the test isn't "fixed" otherwise, please add a comment!
On Aug 1, 2012, at 10:02 , Nuno Lopes <[email protected]> wrote: > Author: nlopes > Date: Wed Aug 1 12:02:30 2012 > New Revision: 161119 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=161119&view=rev > Log: > add test for PR13497 > > Added: > cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/nobuiltin.c > > Added: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/nobuiltin.c > URL: > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/nobuiltin.c?rev=161119&view=auto > ============================================================================== > --- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/nobuiltin.c (added) > +++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/nobuiltin.c Wed Aug 1 12:02:30 2012 > @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ > +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fno-builtin -O1 -S -o - %s | FileCheck %s > + > +void fn() { > + char content[2]; > + // CHECK: __strcpy_chk > + __builtin___strcpy_chk(content, "", 1); > +} > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
