Author: hans
Date: Thu Aug  2 04:04:56 2012
New Revision: 161165

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=161165&view=rev
Log:
test/Sema/tls.c: don't use -verify to check if TLS is supported

Use "%clang_cc1" vs "not %clang_cc1" instead.
Also use -fsyntax-only.

Modified:
    cfe/trunk/test/Sema/tls.c

Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Sema/tls.c
URL: 
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Sema/tls.c?rev=161165&r1=161164&r2=161165&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/Sema/tls.c (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/Sema/tls.c Thu Aug  2 04:04:56 2012
@@ -2,19 +2,19 @@
 // different targets.
 
 // Linux supports TLS.
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-pc-linux-gnu %s
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple i386-pc-linux-gnu %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -fsyntax-only %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple i386-pc-linux-gnu -fsyntax-only %s
 
 // Darwin supports TLS since 10.7.
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -triple x86_64-apple-darwin10 %s
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-macos10.7.0 %s
+// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin10 -fsyntax-only %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-macos10.7.0 -fsyntax-only %s
 
 // FIXME: I thought it was supported actually?
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -triple x86_64-pc-win32 %s
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -triple i386-pc-win32 %s
+// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-pc-win32 -fsyntax-only %s
+// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -triple i386-pc-win32 -fsyntax-only %s
 
 // OpenBSD does not suppport TLS.
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -triple x86_64-pc-openbsd %s
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -triple i386-pc-openbsd %s
+// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-pc-openbsd -fsyntax-only %s
+// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -triple i386-pc-openbsd -fsyntax-only %s
 
-__thread int x; // expected-error {{thread-local storage is unsupported for 
the current target}}
+__thread int x;


_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to