Hello, >> turns out the features page was neither only one with an unclear description >> of clang's >> licence over the GPL nor the page actually discussed in cfe-dev. So I made >> another >> patch for comparison.html (attached). >> >> Please review it and, if ok, commit. >> >> >> With many thanks in advance, >> Jonathan >> > > I can see why 'used' was confusing, but why do you also want to > change, " projects that do not themselves want to be GPL" to "software > that should not itself be GPL-licensed."? Maybe just the simpler > "software that is not GPL-licensed"?
No particular reason, really. In fact, I like your version better, which is why I modified my patch (attached) :-) > Cheers, > Rafael Thanks for your correction, Jonathan
comparison.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
