On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 10:37:24AM -0400, Rafael Esp??ndola wrote: > On 2 August 2012 10:03, Brad Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > Comparing the predefined symbols that OpenBSD/powerpc's gcc target > > provides vs Clang showed that were a few missing in Clang's driver > > config. The attached patch adds the missing ones. > > > > This also defines it for darwin, right? Anyone with an OS X gcc that > still has ppc support? Could you please check if these macros are also > defined there?
If the upstream GNU gcc config matches what Apple is utilizing for their copy of gcc 4.2.1 as shipped with Xcode then what Clang is providing for these symbols does not match what GCC provides for Darwin/OS X nor Linux nor FreeBSD nor OpenBSD. The Darwin/OS X GCC config exposes less symbols and the rest provide more. I'm not that familiar with the Clang code. How do you go about handling the symbols differently for different OS targets? -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
