On 9/5/12 3:02 PM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
Another idea, I was playing with can be seen in the attached patch. I
did not finish thinking about it, so I don't yet submit it as an
official patch, but you may want to have a look.
That's a great idea! User-friendly and actionable error messages are
always good.
Great. The patch still needs some love . We need e.g. to decide if we
want the version info being part of a separate table or if it should
be merged with the method signature table. What do you think?
I think it should live in the method signature table. Related data
should live together.
Makes sense. I attached an updated patch. It should work and may be OK
to commit. I started to think if it would be better to make each entry
an object of a FuncDescription class. This would remove this
ugly use of item[0], ..., item[4]. I will give this a rest for now.
Feel free to commit these changes in case you like them.
That doesn't bother me too much. If you want to change it, I'd use a
namedtuple rather than a full class.
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
