On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Evgeniy Stepanov <[email protected]> wrote:
> Done and committed. I also noticed that we do not catch conflicts between > memory and other sanitizers. > > Let me know if you are not comfortable with a bit of code duplication > there. I think that N*(N-1) explicit checks (for N=3) is still better and > more readable than generic code for arbitrary number of sanitizers. > Here's what we did when UBSan couldn't be combined with either TSan or ASan: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp?r1=168958&r2=169066 ... but this seems fine as it is now.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
