On 03/13/2013 05:33 PM, Damien Buhl wrote: > @Brad King : What do you think about LIBCLANG_LIBRARY_VERSION as a > concatenation of : > CINDEX_VERSION_MAJOR.CINDEX_VERSION_MINOR.CLANG_VERSION_MAJOR.CLANG_VERSION_MINOR > > ? Isn't it a problem that patch and tweak version of the lib are the > major, minor of clang ?
This is a decision for Clang/libclang folks to make, not me. The goal is to provide a version number that applications can use to ensure the libclang they find will meet their needs. The number is for the interface of libclang, so CINDEX_VERSION_* makes sense there IIRC. I'm not familiar enough with the relative versioning of Clang to libclang to make a specific recommendation on CLANG_VERSION_* components. -Brad _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
