lg
================
Comment at: lib/Tooling/ArgumentsAdjusters.cpp:30
@@ +29,3 @@
+ AdjustedArgs.reserve(Args.size() + 1);
+ for (size_t i = 0, e = Args.size(); i < e; ++i) {
+ StringRef Arg = Args[i];
----------------
Very small nit: I think i != e is slightly more common in llvm.
================
Comment at: lib/Tooling/ArgumentsAdjusters.cpp:29
@@ +28,3 @@
+ CommandLineArguments AdjustedArgs;
+ AdjustedArgs.reserve(Args.size() + 1);
+ for (size_t i = 0, e = Args.size(); i < e; ++i) {
----------------
I'm usually against reserve calls unless we think this really affects
performance.
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D917
BRANCH
svn
ARCANIST PROJECT
clang
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits