On Jul 19, 2013, at 12:28 PM, Reid Kleckner <[email protected]> wrote:
> + // XXX: In the Microsoft ABI, we want to emit a delegating complete dtor
> + // without a definition, which means we won't be able to tell if the
> + // definition is a try body. In this case, MSVC simply delegates, so we do
> + // the same.
>
> What is this XXX about? Is this a FIXME? It looks like we're actually doing
> it.
>
> I should remove that. I'm still confused about why destructors defined as
> try bodies need to be a special case, but the current behavior should be
> compatible with cl.exe.
You can’t delegate the base construction when there’s a try body and virtual
bases because then the try body would appear twice on the stack.
John.
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
