Up. Regards, -Michele
> The idea of having something target independent seems considered bad in > the previous messages. IMO the usage of numbers can be unpleasant, > implementation dependent, but I haven't seen a standardized mangling for > OpenCL C. > > My point is that *every* target the mangler should produce different > names even if the address space translation map is the trivial one. > How the address space information is propagated in the IR and the > mangling IMO are orthogonal problem: so the inconsistency you underline > conceptually cannot exist by definition. > > What I noticed is that the mangler now produces wrong names respect to > its purpose (X86 is only the test case). _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
