> I think essentially you are intending to remove some of the builtins from 
> 32-bit ARM target.

Yep, that's correct. And your list matches with my plans for now too.

> Do you mean to use lshr instead of shl, because addhn is to get high narrow, 
> so we could have,

Yes, I did sorry. I'd discovered this, and was planning to mention it when 
posting the patches.

Cheers.

Tim.
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to