I really don't. If anything, I'd probably be leaning towards Hans's side (with .clang-format being nice and consistent with clang-format and the ./_ just being a necessary evil). I don't know how many .clang-format files might be out there, though ;-).
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Hans Wennborg <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Hans Wennborg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Allow _clang-format as alternative to .clang-format config filename > >> > >> Dotfiles are impractical on Windows. This makes clang-format search > >> for the style configuration file as '_clang-format' in addition to > >> the usual '.clang-format'. This is similar to how VIM searches for > >> '_vimrc' on Windows. > > > > > > Ok, the '-' here is getting damn confusing. Should this be _clang_format? > > .clang_format for consistency there? Or do folks really like the format > > here? > > It is already consistent, though. _clang-format is consistent with > .clang-format which is consistent with the name of the tool (which is > consistent with the name of all the other tools). > > Maybe Daniel has an opinion here. > > - Hans >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
