On Sep 21, 2013, at 5:53 PM, Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Howard Hinnant <[email protected]> > wrote: > I really like this patch. It is a nice piece of work. Unfortunately I think > I'm going to have to decline it for ABI reasons. > > Ouch. > > Do you see any path forward here or solution to preserve ABI? We ran into a > nontrivial amount of code which ended up relying on this. The easiest thing I can think of is to wait until libc++ is ready to make ABI breaking changes across the board, and then increment _LIBCPP_ABI_VERSION. I've wondered if Peter's fix would work if we gratuitously restored the unneeded template parameter on __deque_iterator just for the purpose of ABI stability. I don't know the answer to this question, and won't personally have time to investigate it at this time. Howard _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
