On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Nick Lewycky <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 25 September 2013 12:07, Rafael Espindola > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Author: rafael >> Date: Wed Sep 25 14:07:08 2013 >> New Revision: 191394 >> >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=191394&view=rev >> Log: >> Produce an error for unknown -f options. >> > > Err, we aren't ready for this. If we're going to do this, could you stage > it such that the gcc flags are added but ignored, then we error on unknown > options? > This is already how it works. If our list of ignored gcc -f flags isn't complete enough, that's simple to fix. -Eli
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
