libc++ defines max_align_t as long double. I thought they had the same alignment.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 8:22 PM, David Majnemer <[email protected]>wrote: > This implementation of max_align_t disagrees with gcc. They have something > like: > typedef struct { > long long __max_align_ll __attribute__((__aligned__(__alignof__(long > long)))); > long double __max_align_ld __attribute__((__aligned__(__alignof__(long > double)))); > } max_align_t; > > as their definition while you have something like: > > typedef long double max_align_t; > > For a 32-bit x86 target, this means that: > gcc's alignof(max_align_t): 8 > clang's alignof(max_align_t): 4 > > -- > David Majnemer > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Hristo Venev <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Add a definition of max_align_t in stddef.h >> Done by gcc 4.9 and required by libstdc++ 4.9. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cfe-commits mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >> >> >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
