Please put the patch in ToT first and then ping me with the revision to add.
-bw On Dec 4, 2013, at 10:40 AM, Richard Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry for the delay on that patch! Yes, we should try to get that fix into > 3.4. > > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:22 AM, David Blaikie <[email protected]> wrote: > It's best to ping the original review thread rather than creating > others. Feel free to highlight that this might be a 3.4 issue, of > course. > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:16 AM, Faisal Vali <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2092 > > > > I apologize if I'm being a pest about this patch - but since I'm not sure > > > > what the cutoff date is for 3.4 (but it seems like it's rapidly approaching) > > - and I know Richard had expressed interest in incorporating this patch into > > 3.4 - > > just thought i'd bring it up again. > > > > FYI: Currently clang crashes on the following code: > > > > > > int i = 4; > > auto L = [&j = i](auto a) { > > return [k = j]() { return k; }; > > }; > > L(8)(); <-- ICE! > > > > > > All of Richard's feedback has been incorporated (I believe). > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > Faisal Vali > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cfe-commits mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
