On Apr 26, 2014, at 1:23 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@britannica.bec.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 06:55:06PM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote: >> I got a bug report that the unwinder is not using the >> return_address_register value in the CIE. This patch fixes that. > > I had this feature on my TODO list, thanks for doing it. One obvious > question is the size of the return register field. The highest value > used on the architectures I have supported in NetBSD is ARM with 128. > Any reason for not limitting it to uint8_t and putting it near the end > with the bool fields? Done in r207467. I added an assert to validate the return register number fits in a uint8_t. -Nick _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
