On May 30, 2014, at 11:57 AM, jahanian <[email protected]> wrote: > > On May 30, 2014, at 11:41 AM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> On May 30, 2014, at 11:34 AM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On May 30, 2014, at 11:13 AM, jahanian <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Is this intentional, or a specific case for retain/release methods? >>> >>> This also returns TRUE: >>> >>> blk b = ^{}; >>> BOOL res = [b respondsToSelector:@selector(isKindOfClass:)]; >>> >>> So blocks seem to respond to NSObject protocol selectors. >>> >>>> In generally though it makes no sense >>>> to allow qualified id conversion of blocks pointers. >>> >>> It would make sense for id<NSObject> if we would guarantee that blocks >>> conform to NSObject protocol. >> >> BTW, returns true as well: >> >> blk b = ^{}; >> BOOL res = [b conformsToProtocol:@protocol(NSObject)]; > > We should run this by the Foundation people. For example, this also returns 1: > BOOL res = [b respondsToSelector:@selector(dealloc)]; > But dealloc is not a method of NSObject protocol. But it is a method > of NSObject class. It seems more and more that we should make an exception > for NSObject as block implements its protocol and class.
Rules are relaxed to allow certain conversions in r210491. - Fariborz > > - Fariborz > > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
