On Nov 10, 2007, at 2:42 PM, Cédric Venet wrote: > I know you don't want to create dependency on boost [...]
Is there really an aversion to all things Boost here? Some things are often obviously better done with it. For example, see the boost operator header: http://www.boost.org/libs/utility/operators.htm It's pretty tame as boost headers go: It's short and it doesn't depend on the MPL (or anything as mind-bending). And if you're going to write an operator function, it seems like you should at least explain to yourself why you think your approach is better. James Widman -- Gimpel Software http://gimpel.com _______________________________________________ cfe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
