Chris Lattner wrote: > Hi All, > > I whipped up this page to help answer some commonly asked questions > about how clang compares to other compilers: > http://clang.llvm.org/comparison.html > > Comparisons like this are often very sensitive so please let me know > if I am saying anything unfair/non-objective, or am forgetting anything. > Hi Chris, I think this is a fairly fair comparison. Would you mind mentioning my oink fork, pork? It addresses some of the shortcomings that you mentioned. The main differences between oink and pork are that * Integrates with MCPP to allow to "accurately map from a source location in the AST to the original position before preprocessing.". Several Mozilla-specific refactoring tools are provided * Is actively developed (some full-time developers) * Provides a scriptable static analysis tool, Dehydra
Cheers, Taras _______________________________________________ cfe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
