2008/1/30, Steve Naroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Jan 30, 2008, at 8:57 AM, Nuno Lopes wrote: > > Although llvm is much slower at compiling (the linking part seems to be > > really slow due to the -O2 optimizations), the binary produced is much > > faster :) > > This doesn't makes sense to me. Are you using an optimized "release" > version of clang? > > If so, can you compile/measure with -fsyntax-only?
I believe all time is spent in "llvm-ld -O2", which does the interprocedual optimization IIRC. -- Seo Sanghyeon _______________________________________________ cfe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
