On Feb 14, 2008, at 7:58 AM, Eli Friedman wrote: > Per the standard, "int (*)[1.0]" is a variably modified type; however, > isVariablyModifiedType() returns false because it only checks for > vlas. I don't want to just fix this, though, because that will make > isVariablyModifiedType() and getAsVariablyModifiedType() inconsistent. > Should I rename the existing isVariablyModifiedType and > getAsVariablyModifiedType() to something different? > > Ultimately, I think we should split incomplete array types into a > separate class from VariableArrayType... they are conceptually > separate and splitting them will make these predicates less confusing. > Any thoughts on that?
Both sound very reasonable to me! -chris _______________________________________________ cfe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
