On Feb 25, 2008, at 9:45 AM, Mike Stump wrote: > On Feb 24, 2008, at 6:36 PM, Steve Naroff wrote: >> Since clang doesn't support C++ yet, why is this interesting? > > Just an impartial way to measure progress...
Hmm (seems meaningless to me). Since the C++ is so minimal, there are probably better ways to measure/track progress. At this point in clangs development, running C test suites would be much more useful (to me, at least). My 2$, snaroff _______________________________________________ cfe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
