On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 4:25 AM, Timo Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a bit irrelevant in more than one way at the moment, but for > future G++ compatibility there should be a check for __cplusplus.
Hmm, that's a good point... I hadn't really thought about C++. I won't mess with it for now, and we can audit the headers for C++ support once a significant fraction are implemented (the C++ standard has its own extensive section about standard headers which I haven't read in detail). > (Does > the GCC compatibility of clang extend beyond the command-line parameters > of the ccc wrapper script?) clang intends to be gcc-compatible as far as is necessary for existing code to continue working, which means supporting essentially every interesting gcc extension. Of course, some stuff still isn't complete. -Eli _______________________________________________ cfe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
