On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Stelian Ionescu <sione...@cddr.org> wrote: > IMO the change to mem-aref is bad and will break a lot of code. Until > now the contract of mem-aref was that it received a pointer to an array > of the referenced type and returned a pointer offset into the array. > The fact that it now returns a list is a gratuitous change, with no > utility. If we actually want these semantics(not sure about it), it > should be mem-aptr to implement them
If it's not too difficult, can you extract a self-contained test case that has been broken? Cheers, -- Luís Oliveira http://r42.eu/~luis/ _______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
