Hi, Ana, Thank you for your comments.
>I have a comment about the paragraph below (Section 3): > > The resulting CGA Parameters data structure is inserted into a CGA > option as per [RFC3971]. When sending a NDP packet, the node > includes this CGA option and also one signature option of choice, > computed with a private key whose corresponding Public Key >is present > in the CGA Parameters data structure. This signature option can be > the RSA signature option as per [RFC3971], or another signature > option, e.g. the ECC signature option as per [ID-csi-ecc], or any > other signature defined. The signature option contains the hash of > the key used to sign the message. > >It might be useful to clarify the format of the signature >option, or put the reference to the section 4 of >draft-cheneau-send-sig-agility-00, or use exactly the same >terminology as in draft-cheneau-send-sig-agility-00.. We gave reference to rsa signature [RFC3971] and ecdsa signature [ID-csi-ecc]. It's helpful to also refer to draft-cheneau-send-sig-agility-00 as you said. When the two drafts are developed in paralell, we couldn't give enough reference in between the two document because the chapters in both are not stable yet. We will add more reference in similar cases to let the both draft help each other.. Best, Sean _______________________________________________ CGA-EXT mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext
