Hi, > I am not sure what exactly you meant here. Do you actually > mean our draft-jiang-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps needs further refine > (if so, please comments in details), or current RFCs do not > cover CGA & DHCPv6 issues? If it is later, I guess this > draft-jiang-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps is exact the document that meet > you need.
It doesn't mean that draft-jiang-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps needs refining. We think that applying CGA to DHCPv6 could provide stateful CGA auto-configuration, while it could also enhance the security level of DHCPv6. Thus we support this draft being adopted as a wg draft. > Actually, I guess you want more. draft-jiang-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps only > driscribes the possible interactions between cga & dhcpv6. The detailed > specification of these interactions should be defined too. > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-csi-cga-config-dhcpv6-00.txt > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-dhc-secure-dhcpv6-02.txt > are such documents define the extension dhc options to enable possible > interactions mentioned in draft-jiang-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps. > > These works are not in the current CSI charters. However, they may be > included in the future CSI work items. Yes, you're right. Those drafts are what we wanted in our work. We hope these drafts will be included in CSI wg items, and we would like to make some contributions to it. Many thank & best regards. gx su 2009/9/22 Sheng Jiang <[email protected]>: >> > Since current draft about the issue didn't cover every details, >> > updating the document will be of great help to our work. >> >> I am not sure what exactly you meant here. Do you actually >> mean our draft-jiang-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps needs further refine >> (if so, please comments in details), or current RFCs do not >> cover CGA & DHCPv6 issues? If it is later, I guess this >> draft-jiang-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps is exact the document that meet >> you need. > > Actually, I guess you want more. draft-jiang-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps only > driscribes the possible interactions between cga & dhcpv6. The detailed > specification of these interactions should be defined too. > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-csi-cga-config-dhcpv6-00.txt > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-dhc-secure-dhcpv6-02.txt > are such documents define the extension dhc options to enable possible > interactions mentioned in draft-jiang-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps. > > These works are not in the current CSI charters. However, they may be > included in the future CSI work items. > > Many thanks & best regards, > > Sheng > >> > >> > 2009/9/21 marcelo bagnulo braun <[email protected]>: >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > This is the call for adoption of >> > draft-jiang-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps-03.txt >> > > as the WG item to cover the charter itema described as: >> > > >> > > - Develop an informational document analysing different >> > approaches to >> > > allow SeND and CGAs to be used in conjunction with DHCP, >> and making >> > > recommendations on which are the best suited. Recharter >> > based on the >> > > result of the analysis. >> > > >> > > Find the information about the document below. >> > > >> > > Please comment before the 28th of september. >> > > >> > > Thanks, marcelo >> > > >> > > >> > > -------- Mensaje original -------- >> > > Asunto: I-D Action:draft-jiang-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps-03.txt >> > > Fecha: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:45:01 -0700 (PDT) >> > > De: [email protected] >> > > Responder a: [email protected] >> > > Para: [email protected] >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line >> Internet-Drafts >> > > directories. >> > > >> > > Title : DHCPv6 and CGA Interaction: >> > Problem Statement >> > > Author(s) : S. Jiang >> > > Filename : draft-jiang-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps-03.txt >> > > Pages : 8 >> > > Date : 2009-09-18 >> > > >> > > This document describes potential issues in the >> interaction between >> > > DHCPv6 and Cryptographically Generated Addresses (CGAs). >> > Firstly, the >> > > scenario of using CGAs in DHCPv6 environments is discussed. >> > > Some operations are clarified for the interaction of >> DHCPv6 servers >> > > and CGA-associated hosts. We then also discuss how CGAs and >> > DHCPv6 may >> > > have mutual benefits for each other, including using CGAs >> in DHCPv6 >> > > operations to enhance its security features and using DHCPv6 to >> > > provide the CGA generation function. >> > > >> > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: >> > > >> > >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jiang-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps-03.t >> > > xt >> > > >> > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> > > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> > > >> > > Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader >> > > implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the >> > > Internet-Draft. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > I-D-Announce mailing list >> > > [email protected] >> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce >> > > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or >> > > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt >> > > >> > > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > CGA-EXT mailing list >> > > [email protected] >> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext >> > > >> > > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CGA-EXT mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext > > _______________________________________________ CGA-EXT mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext
