Hi, Behcet, In Hiroshima, when we made the first presentation after our draft have been adopted, there was little response from CSI WG to work on the gaps identified in the draft. And as far as I know, CSI WG is not accepting new work now.
So, I assume the follow up requirements can be continue in DHC WG. However, it fully depends on whether DHC WG is interested or not on each individual requirements. After all, the several requirements proposed in draft-ietf-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps have different scenarios and impacts, DHC WG may not be interested in all of them. Best regards, Sheng > -----Original Message----- > From: Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:20 AM > To: Sheng Jiang; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [CGA-EXT] FW: New Version Notification for > draft-ietf-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps-02 > > Hi Sheng, > In this draft you are describing in Sections 2 and 3 a > number of things DHCPv6 can do for CGA. > > It seems like there is a disconnect between CSI which has > originated this PS work and DHC where the protocol work needs > probably be done. > > My question is if there are any plans for a follow up > requirements draft on possible solution work to be undertaken in DHC? > > Regards, > > Behcet > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Sheng Jiang <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Thu, April 22, 2010 9:16:15 PM > > Subject: [CGA-EXT] FW: New Version Notification for > > draft-ietf-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps-02 > > > > A new version has been submitted. Comments from Alberto has been > > addressed > in > > this version. Further comments are > > welcome. > > Regards, > > Sheng > > > -----Original > > Message----- > > From: IETF I-D Submission Tool [mailto: > > ymailto="mailto:[email protected]"; > > href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]] > > Sent: > > Friday, April 23, 2010 10:14 AM > > To: > > ymailto="mailto:[email protected]"; > > href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected] > > Subject: > > New Version Notification for draft-ietf-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps-02 > > > > > > > > A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps-02.txt has > > > > been successfully submitted by Sheng Jiang and posted to the IETF > > repository. > > > > Filename: > > draft-ietf-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps > > Revision: 02 > > > > Title: DHCPv6 and CGA Interaction: Problem > > Statement > > Creation_date: 2010-04-22 > > WG > > ID: csi > > Number_of_pages: 9 > > > > > > Abstract: > > This document describes potential issues in the interaction between > > DHCPv6 and Cryptographically Generated Addresses (CGAs). > > Firstly, the scenario of using CGAs in DHCPv6 environments is > > > > discussed. > > Some > > operations are clarified for the > > interaction of DHCPv6 > > servers and CGA-associated hosts. We then also discuss how CGAs and > > DHCPv6 may have mutual benefits for each other, > > > > including using CGAs in DHCPv6 operations to enhance its > > > > security features and using DHCPv6 to provide the CGA generation > > function. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The IETF Secretariat. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > CGA-EXT mailing > > list > > > href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected] > > > href="https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext"; target=_blank > > >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext > > > _______________________________________________ CGA-EXT mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext
