Ron Savage wrote:
Is Test::WWW::Mechanize the most appropriate harness for testing CGI (but not CGI::Application) code?
I love T::W::M (used with Test::HTML::Content). But why limit yourself to just normal CGI and not CGI::Application code? IMO it's not only important to test the C::A code, but also the environment you're running it in. If you run your tests just via the module but your application runs under Apache, then there will be bugs that your tests don't catch.
-- Michael Peters Plus Three, LP ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
