Hi gvim On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 20:28 +0100, gvim wrote: > On 24/05/2011 19:08, Joshua Miller wrote: > > > > Completely agree and second this. If you have a choice of FastCGI or > > CGI, just go FastCGI. If you're concerned about the differences in > > memory usage and such, you're free to benchmark them, but I can > > assure you that, under any load at all, FastCGI can serve more pages > > using less memory and cpu time. > > > > I just deployed the same app under CGI::Application::PSGI/nginx/Starman and > I'm getting a weird error which is very difficult to debug. The app will run > fine returning a results page from a database lookup but if hit the Back > button and resubmit it will continue successfully for between 5 and 10 > repetitions then fail on one of the app's error handlers for a for field > having too many characters. So nginx has proxied successfully and Starman > returns 200 but it's failing unpredictably. > > I don't know if this has anything to do with it but I used a proxy_pass nginx > setting rather than a fastcgi_pass setting.
This is a completely different topic. You should have started a new thread. I don't run Apache anymore. I run nginx and proxy cgi-bin/ to mini-httpd. A 'weird error' won't be in those programs, it'll be in your code, no matter how hard you find that to believe :-))). It's a classic symptom of using a global variable(s), although (of course) it could be something else. -- Ron Savage http://savage.net.au/ Ph: 0421 920 622 ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
