On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 5:28 PM, John Keeping <j...@keeping.me.uk> wrote: > I really can't see this being sensible without moving to libgit2. As > long as we stick with libgit.a then we need to fork for each request so > I'm not sure there's much benefit to supporting FastCGI without moving > to something that lets us free resources when we're done processing a > request.
The advantage would be not having to reparse the config and scan for repos on every.single.solitary.request. > I'd like to get "new graph implementation" into this list - it's come up > on the list twice in the last 24 hours! That doesn't mean I'm claiming > the task though ;-) That's what I forgot! + new graph implementation _______________________________________________ CGit mailing list CGit@lists.zx2c4.com http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/cgit
